Category Archives: Distancing infrastructures

Farming a Waste-less World

The farm is structured around waste in an interesting way because there are real uses for most of the waste it produces. Some of the waste at the farm includes food scraps and animal waste. I think this is interesting because in most places waste is waste but in this case, waste is actually useful. The term waste implies that there are no further uses for the item but in this case the waste never actually becomes waste. The pigs will eat food scraps which eliminates the waste that they would become. The animals produce waste in the form of feces which becomes manure which helps to produce more food. Then the food scraps can be used to feed the animals and the animals produce manure which is used to produce food then the food scraps become food for the animals who produce manure which is used to produce food and on and on it goes. It is the perfect cycle that does not produce any real waste. Of course, I am not positive that this is how things work here on our farm, but it is in theory one of the perfect and natural cycles that help to avoid waste when used.  

Distancing infrastructures – prompt

Choose a place on campus or in the immediate region.  Describe how this space is physically structured around waste infrastructures, broadly understood, especially if they are structured around distancing people from waste.  Try to choose a space that isn’t obviously a waste site, like not a local waste transfer station, but one where we wouldn’t normally think of waste.  Include photos of the space in your description.  

Readings from this week:

Rathje, William L., and Cullen Murphy. Rubbish!: The Archaeology of Garbage. 1st ed. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1992. (Chapter 4 and 5; pages 81-132)

Calvino, Italo. “Continuous Cities I.” In Invisible Cities. 1st Harvest/HBJ ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978, 114-6.

Clapp, Jennifer. “The Distancing of Waste: Overconsumption in a Global Economy.” In Confronting Consumption, edited by Thomas Princen, Michael Maniates, and Ken Conca. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2002, 155–76.